deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

More from ^Kaz-D in News

Featured in Groups:

Details

June 19, 2012
Sta.sh Writer
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 50
Favourites: 51 [who?]

Views: 5,237 (1 today)
[x]
Courtesy of `sine-out and his fantastic knowledge, we now bring you the fourth in this series of articles. `sine-out has answered all the questions that have come up so far. Do you have one? Is there something you need help with? Drop us a comment and we'll see what we can do! And as always, if you have information that could help someone out, let us know!


"How do I select a new camera?"
~=Eitvys200


 



"One of the most often asked questions I've seen regarding photography, above how to do something, is 'what is the best camera?', or 'what camera should I get?'.

Or something along those lines. The critical thing to note is that there is no such thing as the best camera.
Sure there are cameras that are technically better at certain things, for example, some cameras have very high resolutions, other are very good at low light photography, some are very small, and so on, but there's no such thing as an all encompassing camera that any person can point at and say 'that's the best one you can get', because all photographers are different and thus, have different requirements out of their camera.

As such, the type of camera I could recommend to you depends entirely on what sort of photographs you take, what sort of photographs you want to take, your budget, and a whole slew of other variables and in some cases, compromises, that will help to narrow down your choice.



I use myself as an example.

When I first started to get interested in photography, all I had was a Vivitar 3765 (at least, I think it was). It was a point and shoot camera in the truest sense, it was slow, the picture quality was mediocre at best and it had no manual controls to speak of. Suffice to say, I managed to reach my creative limits with that camera very quickly. Any further creative development on my part necessitated a new camera.

When I managed to get the money for a new camera, I was convinced that I needed a dSLR, so I did my research which eventually lead me to the Nikon D50. During my research, however, I also came across the Panasonic Lumix FZ30, which is a Bridge camera.

It took me several weeks going over the pros and cons of either, I even made detailed analyses on both, listing all the factors of the cameras that I felt were the most important.

Obviously, I finally chose the Nikon D50.

The point, at the time, was that all my decisions in leading to my purchase were compromises. What I gained in some areas I might lose in others. For example, the Nikon D50 with its larger sensor was much better under low light than the FZ30, but it also had a (slightly) lower resolution.



Of course, at the time I was making this decision (middle of 2006), the market wasn't as developed as it is today.
I wouldn't dismiss any class of camera today in your final decision.

You'll probably have noticed that I've tried to avoid pointing to any one type of camera as a suggestion to go to. I mean, while there's no such thing as 'the best' camera, surely, you'd think that I'd be able to point to one camera, or camera form factor that would be 'good enough' for nearly any scenario. But even giving a recommendation for that is fraught with difficulty.



For example, I could say that getting a Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC) also commonly called a Compact System Camera (CSC) would make for a good general purpose camera form factor, as they allow interchangeable lenses, and thus have flexibility to enable being general purpose, but aren't large or heavy in themselves that people would avoid actually using the cameras because they'd be a hassle to carry around all the time. I could say that, but then there'd be many people who'd disagree, some prefer the Phase Detection auto-focus of SLR cameras, some think that even CSC's are too large, and would prefer a camera with a fixed lens.

All my waffling is trying to make the ultimate point that it's basically subjective.
Set yourself a budget (ideally one you can afford :B), figure out what you want the camera to do, and then do lots and lots of research.
Ideally, actually get a hold of the cameras your looking at, and see how they feel to actually use (ergonomics are extremely important, after all, you want to be comfortable in using the camera, or you just won't use it).



Once you've made a shortlist of the cameras you're considering, then you can get third party opinions and suggestions, to give you different perspectives in case you've missed anything obvious that would make a camera a hit or miss to you.

Unfortunately, doing all of this can take time, and it does take a modicum of effort. However, the reward in taking that time and effort, I think are worth it."

~ `sine-out





Previous Troubleshooting Articles...
:bulletblack:Lighting
:bulletblack:Backgrounds
:bulletblack:Noise



:iconkaz-d:
This edition of Photography Troubleshooting will hopefully give you some advice as to what to keep in mind when selecting a new digital camera!
Add a Comment:
 
love 1 1 joy 3 3 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconelectricjonny:
`electricjonny Jun 25, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Huh, I see. I don't use an SLR now, but if I did, I would certainly do that (if the cost was within reason), since I find it an excellent way to focus.
Reply
:iconsine-out:
`sine-out Jun 27, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
You can get them from [link]
They generally cost around $100 at their base price.
Reply
:iconkaz-d:
^Kaz-D Jun 22, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Before I got a decent point and shoot, I held on to an old mobile phone purely because the camera was 8mp - and amazing. I mean, nowadays, it's all improved, but back then it was quite rare to have a decent camera on a phone!

No, they don't tend to come with the split prism focus anymore. But then, I think viewfinders have got increasingly smaller as models have developed. Well, this for Sony anyway, I'm not sure about other kinds but as far as I know, it's not a common focus anymore :(
Reply
:iconelectricjonny:
`electricjonny Jun 22, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Yikes, that is sad to hear. The split prism was really an awesome way to focus. You could tell almost instantly when something was out of focus, and it was a snap to pop it back into focus. How can you tell if things are focused now? Do you just focus till it looks sharp?

Are most viewfinders LCD now? I love my LCD display on my point and shoot, but sometimes a good old fashioned optical viewfinder is just nice to have :lol:
Reply
:iconsine-out:
`sine-out Jun 27, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Virtually every SLR camera still has an OVF, but the majority of new dSLR's have liveview, which generally only outputs to the rear LCD. I can't think of only a handful of examples where a liveview image is displayed in an OVF of a dSLR camera.

When you step away from SLR's though and go with MILC's then you're in EVF territory. My Panasonic G2 is Micro Four Thirds, so it can't have the optics for an optical viewfinder, so instead, it has a 1.4 million dot (about equal to an 800x600 resolution) EVF.

Naturally, you can configure what sort of information is overlaid on the live image, and in my case, you can choose how it is overlaid (as in, it can look like a typical live preview with information shown on top of the image, or like an OVF, with the information below the image). I find the EVF good enough for nearly anything I've thrown at it so far, and it provides the advantage of allowing me to zoom to pixel level detail when I'm doing manual focus, which is often.

Of course, the detail in the EVF doesn't compare to an OVF (yet, anyway), and you don't get noise during low light, and in my case, I wouldn't get colour tearing because my eye has moved, as the EVF in my camera is a Field Sequential system, which means it shows one colour at a time. You win some, you lose some, I suppose :B
Reply
:iconelectricjonny:
`electricjonny Jun 27, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Wow, quite a lot of information about all of this.

But yeah, I guess it's always a constant battle over quality and features.
Reply
:iconkaz-d:
^Kaz-D Jun 22, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
:lol: Well you just know that it's focused. :D Automatically anyway. Anything else and yes, it's quite tricky to get that same accuracy.

I have one of each right now, well, both have LCD displays but only one has live view. Both have the optical viewfinder too of course. I try and use that as much as possible, live view is for awkward angles and that :D In fact I have trouble converting back to the point and shoot which doesn't have the viewfinder. Sort of like being able to play tennis both hands or something >< just doesn't work for me.
Reply
:iconelectricjonny:
`electricjonny Jun 22, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Haha, while auto focus is great, there are just some times when you need to push or pull it a tad to fine tune things :giggle:

LCD's are great, but yeah, you just can't beat the old faithful optical viewfinder. And there is just something intimate and good about putting your eye up to the viewfinder. All you see is the image, so you can really just concentrate on the image and frame it right and all that.
Reply
:iconkaz-d:
^Kaz-D Jun 22, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
:B
Reply
Add a Comment: